TOPIC 3
INDIVIDUAL LEARNING REFLECTION
THE PUSH FOR AUTHENTIC
COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: GETTING THE BALANCE RIGHT
I want to begin my individual reflection with a story. I was
going to write lyrics for a rap song “collaboration for education” as my reflection
but …
Recently an acquaintance involved with a group of young people told me a moving story about the students she was training. The hand in date came and one of the students hadn’t handed in their work. In the true spirit of ubuntu -which is a complex iXhosa idea- but in this context it means “behaving well towards others or acting in ways that benefit the community” they wondered if she could share their marks so that the student at risk could also pass. Now one could either see this as the typical “chutzpah” of students or be impressed with their entrepreneurial spirit. In a sense their inclusive approach could be regarded as an out of the box collaboration. And at its most empathic.
Empathy defined as “to put oneself in another’s shoes” and
not to be confused sympathy which is to acknowledge another’s distress, is one
of the keystone of collaborative learning. And I would exchange empathy with
curiosity. Why? Because curiosity is by nature non-judgmental and being open to
or curious about something which automatically suspends any judgment.
Sadly, my trainer acquaintance was not able to fulfill the students request given the systems that govern outcomes and individual marks. However, would the outcome have been different had she given them a collaborative project?
Definitions
In the piece Are online learners frustrated with
collaborative learning experiences? from The International review of
research in open and distance learning, collaborative learning is defined as “a
specific instruction method in which student teams explore a complex problem by
merging multiple disciplines' concepts, perspectives, and methods “. It’s a
succinct definition. Collaboration is all good and dandy. But here’s the rub.
Insights and contradictions
Western society is very much centered on the individual. “My
rights, my feelings” all take center stage. Individualism reigns supreme. The rally
cry of “be the best”, “standout”, “be noticed”. Get the best marks be original,
compete in a dog eats dog way forgetting (or worse still denying) at our peril
that nature, the world and our lives simply cannot exist without collaboration
whether its hidden or formal. It’s the power behind the individual from the
cleaner who cleans the office at work enabling us to work comfortably, the president’s
secretary, or Beyonce’s assistant. Life and work are one giant collaborative
dance.
On the one hand we are asking students to shine as
individuals and on the other hand we are asking them to be collaborative to share
which has all the elements of creating a classic double bind situation unless handled
carefully. How do we construct a bridge between these diametrically opposed poles?
Consider two major considerations 1) assignments built around “cognitive
and socio-emotional interactions” and 2) gaining the students buy in. With regard the assignments these should use the
elements of curiosity (in place of empathy) perspective- taking,
communication and cooperation as mentioned in The COVID-19 paradox of
online collaborative education: when you cannot physically meet, you need more
social interactions.
How do you gain students buy in? By making common ground
a base line and acknowledging where they come from attitudinally and where they
feel they are heading. It’s important to acknowledge that some students are
taking a course under duress. Maybe parents want their offspring to get a qualification,
but the student does not want to be at the college. This could impact negatively
on the individual and on the group in terms of a collaborative assignment. However,
once the situation is aired and acknowledged there is a chance of moving
forward and a greater possibility of students buy in. Bearing in mind that not
all motivation, whether instrinsic or extrinsic is
born equal.
My work profile
I’m a lecturer at a privately owned film and media college which
offers animation, multimedia, acting, art direction, photography and sound engineering.
Like many creative fields these courses require collaboration whether it’s via
the hidden curriculum or the formal curriculum to succeed. Whether it’s staff with staff, student with
student, staff and student. While some courses such as film / TV and acting are
more collaborative in ethos than animation, not all mark bearing assignments
are collaborative or cross curricula based. Sometimes the collaboration opportunity
is informal and not mark related but vital experientially for the participating
student. Practical assignments are more collaborative friendly than theory but
that’s not to say that theory can’t be collaborative too.
Tools
As for digital tools in collaborative learning and teaching
-I’ve been exposed to a whole cosmos of wonderful possibilities on this course.
Some of which I’ve shared with staff and got my students to use by integrating
them into assignments and in lectures. But I often feel overwhelmed by the choice
and I am not always impressed by them so I limit my toolbox to just a few trusted
ones.
The Personal
My whole life is actually one big collaboration, formal or
informal. Whether its working with students or staff or freelancing as an arts
journalist interviewing people for my articles and discussing ideas with fellow
creatives which could be seen as collaborative but when it comes to the writing
and thinking I’m a lone wolf. Howl.
Comments
Post a Comment